Writing Scientific Journal Articles

Umfrage

Feedback: Writing Articles Workshop

Your background

How long have you been working at ZBT?*

less than 1 year

1-2 years

3-4 years

5-8 years

8 years or longer

What describes best your role at ZBT?*

Bachelor student

Master student

researcher (without PhD degree) / doctoral candidate

Postdoc / researcher with PhD degree

group leader

department head

senior scientitst

engineer

technician

Which ZBT department do you work in?*

Dept. 1

Dept. 2

Dept. 3

Dept. 4

Dept. 5

Dept. 6

Dept. 7

Dept. 8

Dept. 9

not a ZBT employee

Your Experience with Scientific Articles

Please tell us which statement fits best your level of prior experience with writing scientific articles*

I have not contributed to writing a scientific article yet

I have contributed small bits to an article but was not lead author

I have contributed substantially to an article but was not lead author

I have been lead author on one article so far

I have been lead author on several articles

What describes best to which extend the workshop improved how competent you feel about writing scientific articles*

I feel a lot more competent now

It helped a little bit

not sure

It did not really help with how competent I feel abot writing articles

Workshop Organisation

Bitte gib auf einer Skala von 0 (gar nicht) bis 5 (stark) an, wie sehr du den folgenden Aussagen zustimmst?

Die Organisation des Workshops war gut*

Der Workshop war gut strukturiert*

Die Workshopleiterinnen sind in ihrem Thema kompetent*

Die Workshopleiterinnen konnten die Inhalte gut vermitteln*

Die Aufgaben und Lernziele wurden gut verständlich kommuniziert*

Es gab genug Raum, um auf individuelle Probleme und Fragen einzugehen*

Ich werde das Gelernte in meiner Arbeit anwenden*

Ich würde diesen Workshop anderen wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeitenden am ZBT weiterempfehlen*

How would you consider the duration of the workshop*

way too short

a little too short

just right

a little too long

way too long

How would you consider the pace of the workshop*

way too fast

a little too fast

just right

a little too slow

way too slow

How would you rate the relation between input/lecture and own/group activities*

way too much input

a little too much input

just right

a bit too little input

way too little input

How do you assess the group size of the workshop*

way too large

a little too large

just right

a bit too few

way too few

Auf einer Skala von 0 (gar keinen) bis 5 (hoch), wie wertvoll waren die verschiedenen Teile des Workshops für dich

Input 1: General Aspects of a Scientific Article*

Group Work 1: Reviewing Abstracts*

Input 2: Material and Methods*

Group Work 2: Writing Figure Captions*

General Feedback

How would you rate the workshop overall? - On a scale from 0 to 5 (high)*

What did you enjoy most about the workshop?

Which aspects of the workshop do you think could be improved?

What else would you like to tell us about the workshop?

On which other topics would you like to attend trainings?

On which topic(s) could you see yourself giving a workshop / training?

Scientific Publications at ZBT

From 0 (low) to 5 (high) please rate how likely you will seek support from the science management team for future publications*

From 0 (low) to 5 (high) please rate how valuable you find the support for scientific publications offered by the science management team*

What else could be improved at ZBT to support scientific papers to be written and published

Ihre Antworten werden anonym übertragen.